SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Aldridge, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Aldridge, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment and Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease-Related Events

Matthew K. Ito, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS

Department of Pharmacy Practice at the School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA; Cardiovascular Pharmacodynamics Laboratory at the VA San Diego Healthcare System

Gina M. Delucca, PharmD

Cardiovascular Pharmacodynamics Laboratory at the VA San Diego Healthcare System

Martha A. Aldridge, PharmD

Department of Pharmacy Practice at the School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA; Cardiovascular Pharmacodynamics Laboratory at the VA San Diego Healthcare System

Background: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) treatment guidelines, patients with preexisting coronary heart disease (CHD) or other atherosclerotic vascular disease should lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to < 100 mg/dL. Recent statin trials document the benefit of cholesterol lowering on CHD events but do not address the optimal goal of LDL cholesterol.

Methods: The pravastatin to simvastatin conversion-lipid optimization program (PSCOP) at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) was a formulary-conversion program designed to increase the percentage of patients who meet their recommended NCEP LDL cholesterol goal. We compared the incidence of clinical outcome and mortality between CHD patients from the original PSCOP cohort with postconversion LDL cholesterol greater than and < 100 mg/dL. A total of 524 patients were stratified by postconversion LDL cholesterol levels (greater than [N=183]) or < 100 mg/dL [N=341]) and observed for a mean duration of 27.7 months. Patients' VASDHS records were reviewed for postconversion mortality from any cause and CHD-related events. Patients were mailed a questionnaire to capture similar events that may have occurred outside of VASDHS, which might not be present in the patient's VASDHS record.

Results: Lipid-lowering therapy ≤ 100 mg/dL was associated with a significantly lower percentage of total deaths and CHD-related events (40% vs 61%, P=0.008). In patients with LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dL, the relative risk of unstable angina (relative risk, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.8; P=0.004) and stroke (relative risk, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 8.6; P=0.04) were significantly greater compared to patients meeting their LDL cholesterol goal.

Conclusions: Our study results support reducing LDL cholesterol to at least 100 mg/dL in the patient with CHD.

Key Words: LDL cholesterol • treatment goals • simvastatin • pravastatin

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 129-135 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107424840100600204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement