| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Dose-dependent Effect of Rosuvastatin Treatment on HDL-subfraction Phenotype in Patients With Primary HyperlipidemiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, egepi{at}cc.uoi.gr Although the raising effect of rosuvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is well-established, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of this statin on the high-density lipoprotein subfraction phenotype. A total of 150 participants without evidence of cardiovascular disease were randomized to therapeutic lifestyle modification (nonstatin-treated group) or to therapeutic lifestyle modification plus rosuvastatin at 10 mg/d (RSV10 group) or 20 mg/d (RSV20 group). We assessed the effect of rosuvastatin on the cholesterol mass of high-density lipoprotein subfractions at baseline as well as after 12 weeks post-treatment. Rosuvastatin treatment dose-dependently increased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.4% vs 5.3% in the RSV10 and RSV20 groups, respectively, P = .02). A dose-related rosuvastatin-induced increase in the cholesterol concentration of large high-density lipoprotein particles was also noted (by 11.4% in RSV10 group vs 22.0% in the RSV20 group, P = .01). Rosuvastatin treatment increases the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by increasing the cholesterol mass only of the larger high-density lipoprotein particles in a dose-dependent manner.
Key Words: HDL subfractions paraoxonase-1 lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 rosuvastatin
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 14, No. 1,
5-13 (2009) |
|||