SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1074248408323136v1
13/4/252    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cryer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cryer, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction with Etodolac Is not Increased Compared to Naproxen: A Historical Cohort Analysis of a Generic COX-2 Selective Inhibitor

John J. Warner, MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, john.warner{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Rick A. Weideman, PharmD

Division of Pharmacy, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Kevin C. Kelly, PharmD

Division of Pharmacy, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Emmanouil S. Brilakis, MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Subhash Banerjee, MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Francesca Cunningham, PharmD

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Hines, Illinois

William V. Harford, MD

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Salahuddin Kazi, MD

Division of Rheumatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Bertis B. Little, PhD

Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, Texas Data Mining Research Institute and Department of Math, Physics and Engineering, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas

Byron Cryer, MD

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Background: This study compares the risk of acute myocardial infarction among patients exposed to etodolac, naproxen, celecoxib, and rofecoxib.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study in 38 258 veteran patients (26 376 patient-years) measured the adjusted odds ratios of acute myocardial infarction during exposure to etodolac, naproxen, celecoxib, or rofecoxib.

Results: Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was confirmed in 100 patients who were exposed to a study nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Compared to naproxen, the increased risk of acute myocardial infarction was not significant for etodolac (OR = 1.32, P = .27), whereas celecoxib (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.09-4.35, P = .03) and rofecoxib (OR = 2.16, 95 CI 1.04-4.46, P = .04) were significant. A post hoc analysis indicates that patients with a prior history of acute myocardial infarction had a significant, 4.26-fold risk for another acute myocardial infarction if taking celecoxib or rofecoxib.

Conclusion: Etodolac is not associated with a statistically increased risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to naproxen.

Key Words: COX-2 • celecoxib • rofecoxib • etodolac • naproxen • AMI • cohort • epidemiology

This version was published on December 1, 2008

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 252-260 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1074248408323136


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement