|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Greater Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation and Reduced Response Variability With Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel: An Integrated Analysis
Govinda J. Weerakkody, PhD
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, weerakkody_govinda{at}lilly.com
Joseph A. Jakubowski, PhD
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
John T. Brandt, MD
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
Christopher D. Payne, MSc
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
Hideo Naganuma, PhD
Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
Kenneth J. Winters, MD
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
Multiple studies report response variability to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (LD). Pooled platelet aggregometry data compared responses (change in maximal platelet aggregation [ MPA] or inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA]) to clopidogrel 300-mg (n = 131) or prasugrel 60-mg (n = 109) LDs. Poor responder rates were determined using empiric criteria (IPA < 10% and MPA < 10% for 20 µM and 5 µM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) and Bayesian model-based criteria (IPA < 20% and MPA < 15% for 20 µM ADP; IPA < 25% and MPA < 20% for 5 µM ADP). Prasugrel achieved greater MPA and IPA from 2 to 24 hours post-LD (P < .001). For 20 µM ADP, poor responder rates for clopidogrel ranged from 17% to 43%; no prasugrel poor responders were observed. Regardless of the criterion, prasugrel 60 mg achieved greater IPA and fewer poor responders than the clopidogrel 300-mg LD.
Key Words: clopidogrel prasugrel platelet aggregation thienopyridines resistance P2Y12 ADP
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 12, No. 3,
205-212 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1074248407304731

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Wallentin
P2Y12 inhibitors: differences in properties and mechanisms of action and potential consequences for clinical use
Eur. Heart J.,
August 2, 2009;
30(16):
1964 - 1977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Veverka and J. M. Hammer
Prasugrel: A New Thienopyridine Inhibitor
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
April 1, 2009;
22(2):
158 - 165.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. S. Kleiman
Will Measuring Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein Phosphorylation Help Us Optimize the Loading Dose of Clopidogrel?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 8, 2008;
51(14):
1412 - 1414.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Kereiakes and P. A. Gurbel
Peri-Procedural Platelet Function and Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Small, N. A. Farid, C. D. Payne, G. J. Weerakkody, Y. G. Li, J. T. Brandt, D. E. Salazar, and K. J. Winters
Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Lansoprazole on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Prasugrel and Clopidogrel
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2008;
48(4):
475 - 484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|