This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Naccarelli, G. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Naccarelli, G. V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Antiadrenergic Therapy in the Control of Atrial Fibrillation

Division of Cardiology, Penn State University, College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure develops commonly in older individuals and its prevalence increases as heart failure severity progresses. Because of deteriorating hemodynamics, patients with heart failure are at increased risk for developing AF and, conversely, AF in heart failure patients is associated with adverse hemodynamic changes. AF is believed to increase the mortality risk in heart failure, which may be minimized by treatment that includes the control of ventricular rate, prevention of thrombotic events, and conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Clinical guidelines recommend amiodarone or dofetilide in heart failure patients, but these drugs have certain drawbacks, such as an increased risk for bradyarrhythmias with amiodarone and proarrhythmic reaction with dofetilide. Some but not all clinical trials have suggested that rate control should be the primary therapeutic goal in high-risk heart failure patients with AF and, if unsuccessful, followed by rhythm control. The former is effectively achieved with rate-lowering ß-blockers alone or in combination with digoxin. Recent studies evaluating the effects of combination carvedilol/digoxin therapy demonstrate synergistic effects between the two drugs. This combination therapy decreased heart failure symptoms, effectively reduced ventricular rate, and improved ventricular function to a greater extent compared with that produced by either drug alone. Although digoxin alone is an effective heart failure treatment, its use as a single rate-control therapy is often ineffective in heart failure patients with AF associated with rapid ventricular response. Carvedilol is effective, alone or in combination, with digoxin in such heart failure patients with AF, and has been shown to reduce mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure during prolonged therapy.

Key Words: heart failure • atrial fibrillation • rate control • rhythm control • carvedilol • digoxin

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 10, No. 4 suppl, S33-S43 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/10742484050100i405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. N. Singh {beta}-Adrenergic Blockers as Antiarrhythmic and Antifibrillatory Compounds: An Overview Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, October 1, 2005; 10(4_suppl): S3 - S14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. R. Kowey A Review of Carvedilol Arrhythmia Data in Clinical Trials Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, October 1, 2005; 10(4_suppl): S59 - S68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Wadhani and B. N. Singh Prolongation of Repolarization as Antifibrillatory Action Revisited: Drug Combination Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2005; 10(3): 149 - 152. [PDF]