SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahimi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahimi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Blood Thinners
Hazardous Substances DB
*HEPARIN
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bivalirudin vs Heparin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pooled Analysis

Ramin Ebrahimi, MD

University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, West Los Angeles VA, Los Angeles, CA

A. Michael Lincoff, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

John A. Bittl, MD

Ocala Heart and Vascular Institute, Munroe Regional Medical Center, Ocala, FL

Derek Chew, MD

Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia

Kathy Wolski, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Nitin Wadhan, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Edward J. Toggart, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Eric J. Topol, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Objective: This study evaluates outcomes with bivalirudin vs heparin in various patient subgroups and the overall population during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Background: Recent data suggest that bivalirudin, a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, provides ischemic protection superior to heparin and comparable to heparin plus glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors but with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Whether this advantage persists in different subgroups has not been fully defined. To our knowledge, this is the largest pooled analysis of bivalirudin to date.

Methods: Four randomized controlled trials were identified that compared bivalirudin to heparin (with or without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors) in PCI. The incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and major bleeding at 48 hours was compared between these two agents overall and in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal insufficiency, and advanced age.

Results: The trials consisted of 11,638 patients (bivalirudin, 5,861; heparin, 5,777). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. At 48 hours, the incidence of death, MI, revascularization, and major bleeding was significantly reduced in the bivalirudin group (7.8% vs 1.08%, P < .001); individual ischemic end points were significantly reduced for death (0.01% vs 0.02%, P = .049) and revascularization (2.0% vs 2.7%, P = .02), with similar reductions for major bleeding (2.7% vs 5.8%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis was generally consistent with the overall findings.

Conclusion: This analysis further supports the superiority of bivalirudin compared with heparin. Bivalirudin provides excellent ischemic protection with a significant reduction of bleeding complications, even in high-risk subgroups.

Key Words: anticoagulation • percutaneous coronary intervention • bivalirudin

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 209-216 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/107424840501000401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Schulman, R. J. Beyth, C. Kearon, and M. N. Levine
Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant and Thrombolytic Treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 257S - 298S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. A. Crowther and T. E. Warkentin
Bleeding risk and the management of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy: focus on new anticoagulant agents
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4871 - 4879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. Singh, J. Molnar, and R. Arora
Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparins in Reduction of Cardiac Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2007; 12(4): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. J. Gudmundsdottir, I. L. Megson, J. S. Kell, C. A. Ludlam, K. A.A. Fox, D. J. Webb, and D. E. Newby
Direct Vascular Effects of Protease-Activated Receptor Type 1 Agonism In Vivo in Humans
Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1625 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement