SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Carvedilol Improves Myocardial Contractility Compared With Metoprolol in Patients With Chronic Hibernating Myocardium After Revascularization

Ernst R. Schwarz, MD, PhD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, Department of Cardiology, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Rajiv Gupta, MD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Tu Phuong Diep, MD

Department of Cardiology, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Bernd Nowak, MD

Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Sawa Kostin, MD

Department of Experimental Cardiology, Max Planck-Institute, Bad Nauheim, Germany

Beate Grohmann, BS

Department of Experimental Cardiology, Max Planck-Institute, Bad Nauheim, Germany

Barry F. Uretsky, MD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Jutta Schaper, MD, PhD

Department of Experimental Cardiology, Max Planck-Institute, Bad Nauheim, Germany

Background: We tested the hypothesis of whether carvedilol delays morphologic degeneration and improves functional outcome compared with metoprolol tartrate in patients with hibernating myocardium undergoing surgical revascularization. We have previously shown that patients with chronic hibernating myocardium undergo progressive cellular degeneration and fibrosis.

Methods: Twenty patients with multivessel coronary artery disease revascularization and hibernating myocardium as assessed by technetium-99m perfusion scintigraphy and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were randomized to receive either carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate for at least 2 months before surgery, and this was continued for 7 months postoperatively. Left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion abnormalities were assessed by left ventriculography at baseline and 7 months postoperatively. Intraoperative transmural needle biopsy samples were obtained for microscopic analysis.

Results: Postoperatively, the ejection fraction increased from 31% ± 5% to 44% ± 4% (P < .005) in the carvedilol group (n = 10), and from 30% ± 6% to 40% ± 6% in the metoprolol tartrate group (P < .05 vs preoperatively and vs carvedilol). Wall motion abnormalities in the carvedilol group improved from -2.1 ± 0.4 to -0.6 ± 0.5 (P < .05) and from -2.3 ± 0.5 to -1.6 ± 0.6 in the metoprolol tartrate group (P < .05 vs preoperatively and vs carvedilol). Microscopic analysis after 72 ± 18 days of either treatment showed mild cardiomyocyte degeneration and moderate-to-severe fibrosis (28% ± 7%) in the carvedilol group compared with moderate cardiomyocyte degeneration and moderate-to-severe fibrosis (33% ± 6%) in the metoprolol tartrate group. Apoptosis, as assessed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labeling method, was observed in only 1 patient in each group.

Conclusions: Carvedilol treatment of hibernating myocardium results in improved functional recovery after revascularization compared with metoprolol tartrate, and this might partially be related to reduced cardiomyocyte degeneration.

Key Words: carvedilol • hibernating myocardium • myocardial function • apoptosis

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 181-190 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/107424840501000306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
D. Domanski and E. R. Schwarz
Clinical Review: Is the Perioperative Use of {beta}-Blockers Still Recommended? A Critical Review of Recent Controversies
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2009; 14(4): 258 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
E. R. Schwarz, T. Tussing, E. Skobel, B. Klosterhalfen, D. Domanski, and J. E. Fuess
Application of Zinc-bis-(DL-Hydrogensaspartate) Does Not Reduce Apoptotic Cell Death in Myocardial Infarction in the Rat Heart
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2009; 14(3): 215 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement