SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Messerli, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Messerli, F. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Investigative Concerns in Demonstrating Reduced Risk from Reversing Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Edward D. Frohlich

Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Dagnovar Aristizabal

Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Federico Soria

Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Franz H. Messerli

Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Background: To demonstrate reduced risk from reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertension, one must show that it is independent of blood pressure reduction.

Methods and Results: A feasibility study was conducted with 15 patients. The study employed 48-hour Holter recording, exercise treadmill (for ST-segment changes) and, as nec essary, thallium scintigraphy and coronary angiography. All patients were treated for 3 months with quinapril (10 mg) and demonstrated decreased mean arterial pressure (125 ± 3.1 vs 103 ± 1.9 mmHg; P < .01) and left ventricular mass index (125 ± 6.4 vs 104 ± 4.9; P < .02) with preserved left ventricular function. There were no significant changes in these patients with moderate LVH in the incidence of arrhythmias; however, 4 of the 15 patients developed ST-segment changes prior to LVH reversal, and these changes did not recur in 3 patients following reversal of LVH or when pressure was allowed to rise.

Conclusions: Ischemic changes, rather than development of arrhythmias, may be of greater value in demonstrating risk reduction with LVH reversal. Nloreover, these preliminary data suggest pitfalls in demonstrating risk reduction after LVH reversal, indicating that more sen sitive and adequate techniques are necessary to show risk reduction from LVH.

Key Words: essential hypertension • left ventricular hypertrophy • risk from LVH • holter recording • thallium scintigraphy • treadmill testing • LVH reversal • quinapril.

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 17-22 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/107424849600100104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement